DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1984 Audi 90 vs 1983 Saab 99 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 99

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 90SpecificationSaab 99
AudiMakeSaab
90Model99
1984Model year1983
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi 90SpecificationSaab 99
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
187 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
113 HPPower100 HP
165 NmTorque161 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 90SpecificationSaab 99
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank54 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 90SpecificationSaab 99
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/60 R14Tyre size—

Dimensions

Audi 90SpecificationSaab 99
4465 mmLength4420 mm
1682 mmWidth1690 mm
1365 mmHeight1435 mm
1060 KgWeight1161 Kg
2538 mmWheelbase2477 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1984 Audi 90 and 1983 Saab 99 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 99 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…