DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1984 Audi 200 vs 1984 Audi 90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.5–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 200SpecificationAudi 90
AudiMakeAudi
200Model90
1984Model year1984
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi 200SpecificationAudi 90
11,1 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed187 km/h
2144 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
136 HPPower113 HP
180 NmTorque165 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 200SpecificationAudi 90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,5 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 200SpecificationAudi 90
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size185/60 R14

Dimensions

Audi 200SpecificationAudi 90
4807 mmLength4465 mm
1814 mmWidth1682 mm
1422 mmHeight1365 mm
1260 KgWeight1060 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2538 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1984 Audi 200 and 1984 Audi 90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…