DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1984 Audi 90 vs 1982 Saab 900 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 900

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 90SpecificationSaab 900
AudiMakeSaab
90Model900
1984Model year1982
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

Audi 90SpecificationSaab 900
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
187 km/hTop speed167 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
113 HPPower108 HP
165 NmTorque161 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 90SpecificationSaab 900
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 90SpecificationSaab 900
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size—

Dimensions

Audi 90SpecificationSaab 900
4465 mmLength4941 mm
1682 mmWidth1690 mm
1365 mmHeight1422 mm
1060 KgWeight1214 Kg
2538 mmWheelbase2718 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1984 Audi 90 and 1982 Saab 900 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 900 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…