DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1984 Audi 90 vs 1984 Audi 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.25–60.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 90SpecificationAudi 200
AudiMakeAudi
90Model200
1984Model year1984
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi 90SpecificationAudi 200
9,5 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
187 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2144 cc
113 HPPower136 HP
165 NmTorque180 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 90SpecificationAudi 200
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption12,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,8 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 90SpecificationAudi 200
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size205/60 R15

Dimensions

Audi 90SpecificationAudi 200
4465 mmLength4807 mm
1682 mmWidth1814 mm
1365 mmHeight1422 mm
1060 KgWeight1260 Kg
2538 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1984 Audi 90 and 1984 Audi 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…