DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Jeep Compass vs 2013 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeChevrolet
CompassModelCaptiva
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,90 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
201 km/hTop speed188 km/h
2143 ccEngine displacement2231 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
320 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank65 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4448 mmLength4673 mm
1812 mmWidth1868-1849 mm
1718 mmHeight1756 mm
1680 KgWeight1778 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Jeep Compass and 2013 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…