2013 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi (163 Hp) 2013Overall Score68.5/100
2013 Ford Kuga vs 2013 Jeep Compass Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Jeep
Compass
Jeep Compass 2.2 CRD (163 Hp) 2013Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Ford Kuga
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford KugaSpecificationJeep Compass
FordMakeJeep
KugaModelCompass
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford KugaSpecificationJeep Compass
9,9 s0–100 km/h10,90 s
198 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
340 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford KugaSpecificationJeep Compass
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank51 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford KugaSpecificationJeep Compass
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford KugaSpecificationJeep Compass
4524 mmLength4448 mm
1838 mmWidth1812 mm
1701 mmHeight1718 mm
1692 KgWeight1680 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2635 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Ford Kuga and 2013 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…