DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Jeep Compass vs 2013 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeFord
CompassModelKuga
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,90 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
201 km/hTop speed198 km/h
2143 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
320 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4448 mmLength4524 mm
1812 mmWidth1838 mm
1718 mmHeight1701 mm
1680 KgWeight1692 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Jeep Compass and 2013 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…