DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo XC60 vs 2012 Jeep Compass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeJeep
XC60ModelCompass
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h10,90 s
195 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
400 NmTorque320 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4627 mmLength4448 mm
1891 mmWidth1812 mm
1713 mmHeight1718 mm
1728 KgWeight1680 Kg
2774 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo XC60 and 2012 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…