DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jeep Compass vs 2012 Honda CR-V Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeHonda
CompassModelCR-V
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,90 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
201 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2143 ccEngine displacement2199 cc
163 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank58 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size225/65 R17; 225/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4448 mmLength4574 mm
1812 mmWidth1820 mm
1718 mmHeight1675 mm
1680 KgWeight1713 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jeep Compass and 2012 Honda CR-V approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…