DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Mazda MPV vs 2011 Jeep Compass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MPV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeJeep
MPVModelCompass
2011Model year2011
MinivanBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,90 s
0 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
203 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption7,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears6
215/55 R18Tyre size215/60 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4870 mmLength4448 mm
1850 mmWidth1812 mm
1685 mmHeight1718 mm
—Weight1680 Kg
2950 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Mazda MPV and 2011 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MPV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…