DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Jeep Compass vs 2013 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jeep CompassSpecificationMazda 3
JeepMakeMazda
CompassModel3
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Jeep CompassSpecificationMazda 3
10,90 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
180 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2143 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower120 HP
320 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Jeep CompassSpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank51 lt
7,40 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
5,40 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,10 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jeep CompassSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jeep CompassSpecificationMazda 3
4448 mmLength4460 mm
1812 mmWidth1795 mm
1718 mmHeight1450 mm
1634 KgWeight1205 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Jeep Compass and 2013 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…