DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Jeep Compass vs 2009 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeSubaru
CompassModelForester
2009Model year2009
SUVBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,00 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
189 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
310 NmTorque196 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,30 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
5,40 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
6,50 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
215/60 R17Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4405 mmLength4485 mm
1810 mmWidth1735 mm
1630 mmHeight1590 mm
1615 KgWeight1390 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Jeep Compass and 2009 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…