DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Volvo V50 vs 2009 Jeep Compass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Compass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeJeep
V50ModelCompass
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h11,00 s
0 km/hTop speed189 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
136 HPPower140 HP
320 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank51 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption8,30 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,40 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption6,50 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4522 mmLength4405 mm
1845 mmWidth1810 mm
1457 mmHeight1630 mm
1472 KgWeight1615 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Volvo V50 and 2009 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Compass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…