DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Jeep Commander vs 2010 Volvo XC70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeVolvo
CommanderModelXC70
2010Model year2010
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
191 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2987 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
218 HPPower243 HP
510 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption14 lt
9,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
—Average consumption10,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
245/65R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4787 mmLength4838 mm
1900 mmWidth1870 mm
1826 mmHeight1604 mm
2245 KgWeight1956 Kg
2781 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Jeep Commander and 2010 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…