DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Jeep Cherokee vs 2012 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

78.75–79.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeJaguar
CherokeeModelXJ
2013Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h6,4 s
206 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3239 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
272 HPPower275 HP
315 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank82 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
10,0 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
9Gears6
225/60 R17; 225/55 R18Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4624 mmLength—
1859 mmWidth—
1670 mmHeight—
1892-1906 KgWeight—
2700 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Jeep Cherokee and 2012 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…