DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jaguar XJ vs 2013 Jeep Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

79.25–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeJeep
XJModelCherokee
2012Model year2013
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
250 km/hTop speed206 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement3239 cc
275 HPPower272 HP
0 NmTorque315 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption10,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears9
—Tyre size225/60 R17; 225/55 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4624 mm
—Width1859 mm
—Height1670 mm
—Weight1892-1906 Kg
—Wheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jaguar XJ and 2013 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…