2008 • Jeep
Cherokee
Jeep Cherokee 2.8 CRD (177 Hp) 2008Overall Score68.5/100
2008 Jeep Cherokee vs 2008 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2008Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Jeep Cherokee
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationFord Ranger
JeepMakeFord
CherokeeModelRanger
2008Model year2008
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationFord Ranger
10,5 s0–100 km/h—
179 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2778 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
177 HPPower143 HP
460 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationFord Ranger
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption—
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationFord Ranger
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/65 R17; 235/60 R18Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationFord Ranger
4493 mmLength5075 mm
1839 mmWidth1805 mm
1797 mmHeight1745 mm
1980 KgWeight—
2694 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Jeep Cherokee and 2008 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…