2008 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2008Overall Score67.75/100
2008 Ford Ranger vs 2008 Jeep Cherokee Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Jeep
Cherokee
Jeep Cherokee 2.8 CRD (177 Hp) 2008Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Jeep Cherokee
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationJeep Cherokee
FordMakeJeep
RangerModelCherokee
2008Model year2008
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationJeep Cherokee
—0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2778 cc
143 HPPower177 HP
330 NmTorque460 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationJeep Cherokee
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption12,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,8 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationJeep Cherokee
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size235/65 R17; 235/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationJeep Cherokee
5075 mmLength4493 mm
1805 mmWidth1839 mm
1745 mmHeight1797 mm
—Weight1980 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2694 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Ford Ranger and 2008 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…