DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Audi 80 vs 1995 Ford Contour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Contour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationFord Contour
AudiMakeFord
80ModelContour
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationFord Contour
9,8 s0–100 km/h—
197 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
140 HPPower132 HP
185 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationFord Contour
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank61 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationFord Contour
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size185/70 R14 V

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationFord Contour
4482 mmLength4658 mm
1695 mmWidth1749 mm
1408 mmHeight1374 mm
1310 KgWeight1320 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Audi 80 and 1995 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…