2009 • Jaguar
XJ
Jaguar XJ 5.0 V8 (385 Hp) 2009Overall Score79.25/100
2009 Jaguar XJ vs 2004 Ford Mustang Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 4.6 V8 32V Cobra (324 Hp) 2004Overall Score78.75/100
WINNER
Jaguar XJ
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
79.25–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jaguar XJSpecificationFord Mustang
JaguarMakeFord
XJModelMustang
2009Model year2004
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
4Doors2
Performance
Jaguar XJSpecificationFord Mustang
5,7 s0–100 km/h5,5 s
250 km/hTop speed240 km/h
5000 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
385 HPPower324 HP
0 NmTorque430 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Jaguar XJSpecificationFord Mustang
PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank59 lt
17,0 ltUrban consumption18 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Jaguar XJSpecificationFord Mustang
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size245/45 R17
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Jaguar XJSpecificationFord Mustang
—Length4653 mm
—Width1857 mm
—Height1350 mm
—Weight1615 Kg
—Wheelbase2573 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Jaguar XJ and 2004 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSComments are loading…