DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Mustang vs 2009 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

78.75–79.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeJaguar
MustangModelXJ
2004Model year2009
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

5,5 s0–100 km/h5,7 s
240 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement5000 cc
324 HPPower385 HP
430 NmTorque0 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank82 lt
18 ltUrban consumption17,0 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
—Average consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/45 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4653 mmLength—
1857 mmWidth—
1350 mmHeight—
1615 KgWeight—
2573 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Mustang and 2009 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…