DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Jaguar XJ vs 2003 Wiesmann GT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Wiesmann GT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

87.5–88.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeWiesmann
XJModelGT
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

5,6 s0–100 km/h4,4 s
250 km/hTop speed293 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3999 cc
363 HPPower420 HP
505 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
81 ltFuel tank70 lt
18 ltUrban consumption17,9 lt
9,5 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt
12,6 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
255/40 R18Tyre size245/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5023 mmLength4230 mm
1799 mmWidth1880 mm
1345 mmHeight1190 mm
1845 KgWeight1370 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2507 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Jaguar XJ and 2003 Wiesmann GT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Wiesmann GT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…