DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Wiesmann GT vs 2003 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Wiesmann GT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

88.5–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

WiesmannMakeJaguar
GTModelXJ
2003Model year2003
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

4,4 s0–100 km/h5,6 s
293 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3999 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
420 HPPower363 HP
400 NmTorque505 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank81 lt
17,9 ltUrban consumption18 lt
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,5 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption12,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
245/45 R18Tyre size255/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4230 mmLength5023 mm
1880 mmWidth1799 mm
1190 mmHeight1345 mm
1370 KgWeight1845 Kg
2507 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Wiesmann GT and 2003 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Wiesmann GT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…