DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Jaguar XJ vs 1996 De Tomaso Guara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

De Tomaso Guara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

86.5–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeDe Tomaso
XJModelGuara
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

6,3 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed260 km/h
3980 ccEngine displacement3982 cc
320 HPPower283 HP
512 NmTorque402 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
86 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption20 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
12,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
255/45 R17Tyre size285/35 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5023 mmLength4190 mm
1798 mmWidth2030 mm
1303 mmHeight1200 mm
1875 KgWeight1200 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Jaguar XJ and 1996 De Tomaso Guara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, De Tomaso Guara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…