DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 De Tomaso Guara vs 1996 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

De Tomaso Guara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

87.5–86.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

De TomasoMakeJaguar
GuaraModelXJ
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

5,0 s0–100 km/h6,3 s
270 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3982 ccEngine displacement3980 cc
304 HPPower320 HP
431 NmTorque512 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
94 ltFuel tank86 lt
15 ltAverage consumption12,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
245/40 ZR18Tyre size255/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4190 mmLength5023 mm
2030 mmWidth1798 mm
1200 mmHeight1303 mm
985 KgWeight1875 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 De Tomaso Guara and 1996 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, De Tomaso Guara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…