DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Jaguar XJ vs 2004 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

83.75–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XJSpecificationAudi A3
JaguarMakeAudi
XJModelA3
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

Jaguar XJSpecificationAudi A3
7,6 s0–100 km/h6,5 s
242 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3555 ccEngine displacement3189 cc
258 HPPower250 HP
335 NmTorque320 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XJSpecificationAudi A3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank60 lt
15,9 ltUrban consumption14,8 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XJSpecificationAudi A3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/55 R17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XJSpecificationAudi A3
5090 mmLength4203 mm
1860 mmWidth1765 mm
1448 mmHeight1421 mm
1615 KgWeight1495 Kg
3034 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Jaguar XJ and 2004 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…