DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Audi A3 vs 2005 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.5–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A3SpecificationJaguar XJ
AudiMakeJaguar
A3ModelXJ
2004Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

Audi A3SpecificationJaguar XJ
6,5 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
250 km/hTop speed242 km/h
3189 ccEngine displacement3555 cc
250 HPPower258 HP
320 NmTorque335 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A3SpecificationJaguar XJ
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank85 lt
14,8 ltUrban consumption15,9 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A3SpecificationJaguar XJ
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A3SpecificationJaguar XJ
4203 mmLength5090 mm
1765 mmWidth1860 mm
1421 mmHeight1448 mm
1495 KgWeight1615 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase3034 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Audi A3 and 2005 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…