1983 • Audi
80
Audi 80 2.0 CD (115 Hp) 1983Overall Score61.25/100
1983 Audi 80 vs 1983 Pontiac 6000 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1983 • Pontiac
6000
Pontiac 6000 2.5 i (106 Hp) 1983Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Pontiac 6000
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationPontiac 6000
AudiMakePontiac
80Model6000
1983Model year1983
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2/4Doors4
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationPontiac 6000
9,9 s0–100 km/h—
184 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2471 cc
115 HPPower106 HP
165 NmTorque183 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationPontiac 6000
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank59 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationPontiac 6000
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears3
175/70 R13Tyre size195/70 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationPontiac 6000
4383 mmLength4795 mm
1682 mmWidth1830 mm
1365 mmHeight1365 mm
1030 KgWeight1275 Kg
2541 mmWheelbase2665 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1983 Audi 80 and 1983 Pontiac 6000 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Pontiac 6000 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…