1983 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 2.3i (106 Hp) 1983Overall Score62.25/100
1983 Ford Mustang vs 1983 Audi 80 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1983 • Audi
80
Audi 80 2.0 CD (115 Hp) 1983Overall Score61.25/100
WINNER
Ford Mustang
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
62.25–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MustangSpecificationAudi 80
FordMakeAudi
MustangModel80
1983Model year1983
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors2/4
Performance
Ford MustangSpecificationAudi 80
—0–100 km/h9,9 s
165 km/hTop speed184 km/h
2301 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
106 HPPower115 HP
183 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MustangSpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank68 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MustangSpecificationAudi 80
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/75 R14Tyre size175/70 R13
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford MustangSpecificationAudi 80
4560 mmLength4383 mm
1735 mmWidth1682 mm
1320 mmHeight1365 mm
1340 KgWeight1030 Kg
2555 mmWheelbase2541 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1983 Ford Mustang and 1983 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…