1983 • Audi
80
Audi 80 2.0 CD (115 Hp) 1983Overall Score61.25/100
1983 Audi 80 vs 1983 Ford Mustang Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1983 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 2.3i (106 Hp) 1983Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Ford Mustang
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationFord Mustang
AudiMakeFord
80ModelMustang
1983Model year1983
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
2/4Doors2
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationFord Mustang
9,9 s0–100 km/h—
184 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2301 cc
115 HPPower106 HP
165 NmTorque183 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationFord Mustang
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank58 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationFord Mustang
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size195/75 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationFord Mustang
4383 mmLength4560 mm
1682 mmWidth1735 mm
1365 mmHeight1320 mm
1030 KgWeight1340 Kg
2541 mmWheelbase2555 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1983 Audi 80 and 1983 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…