DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Jaguar XJ vs 2006 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XJSpecificationSaab 9-3
JaguarMakeSaab
XJModel9-3
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Jaguar XJSpecificationSaab 9-3
8,2 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
222 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2722 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
207 HPPower250 HP
435 NmTorque350 Nm
6Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XJSpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank62 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption15,4 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XJSpecificationSaab 9-3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XJSpecificationSaab 9-3
5090 mmLength4635 mm
1860 mmWidth1762 mm
1448 mmHeight1466 mm
1657 KgWeight1555 Kg
3034 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Jaguar XJ and 2006 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…