DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Saab 9-3 vs 2006 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationJaguar XJ
SaabMakeJaguar
9-3ModelXJ
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationJaguar XJ
6,9 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
250 km/hTop speed222 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2722 cc
250 HPPower207 HP
350 NmTorque435 Nm
—Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationJaguar XJ
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank85 lt
15,4 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationJaguar XJ
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationJaguar XJ
4635 mmLength5090 mm
1762 mmWidth1860 mm
1466 mmHeight1448 mm
1555 KgWeight1657 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase3034 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Saab 9-3 and 2006 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…