DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Jaguar XF vs 2004 Cadillac SRX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

90.5–89.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeCadillac
XFModelSRX
2009Model year2004
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

5,7 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed210 km/h
5000 ccEngine displacement4565 cc
385 HPPower324 HP
515 NmTorque420 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
17,3 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
245/45R18Tyre size235/60 R18; 255/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4961 mmLength4950 mm
1877 mmWidth1845 mm
1460 mmHeight1670 mm
1780 KgWeight2045 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase2957 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Jaguar XF and 2004 Cadillac SRX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…