DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Ford Mustang vs 2009 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

91.5–90.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeJaguar
MustangModelXF
2005Model year2009
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,7 s
280 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement5000 cc
390 HPPower385 HP
529 NmTorque515 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption17,3 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
—Average consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/40 R17Tyre size245/45R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4661 mmLength4961 mm
1857 mmWidth1877 mm
1344 mmHeight1460 mm
1745 KgWeight1780 Kg
2573 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Ford Mustang and 2009 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…