DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Jaguar XF vs 2016 Alpina D4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina D4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

92.5–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina D4
JaguarMakeAlpina
XFModelD4
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina D4
6,2 s0–100 km/h5,0 s
250 km/hTop speed275 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
300 HPPower350 HP
700 NmTorque700 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina D4
DieselFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank57 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina D4
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears8 Switch-Tronic
—Tyre size245/35 ZR19; 265/35 ZR19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina D4
4954 mmLength4640 mm
1987 mmWidth1825 mm
1457 mmHeight1382 mm
1750 KgWeight1815 Kg
2960 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Jaguar XF and 2016 Alpina D4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina D4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…