DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Alpina XD3 vs 2016 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina XD3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

93.5–92.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alpina XD3SpecificationJaguar XF
AlpinaMakeJaguar
XD3ModelXF
2016Model year2016
CrossoverBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Alpina XD3SpecificationJaguar XF
4,9 s0–100 km/h6,2 s
251 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
350 HPPower300 HP
700 NmTorque700 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Alpina XD3SpecificationJaguar XF
DieselFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank66 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Alpina XD3SpecificationJaguar XF
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8 Switch-TronicGears8
255/40 ZR20; 285/35 ZR20Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Alpina XD3SpecificationJaguar XF
4651 mmLength4954 mm
1901 mmWidth1987 mm
1670 mmHeight1457 mm
1910 KgWeight1750 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2960 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Alpina XD3 and 2016 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina XD3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…