2015 • Jaguar
XF
Jaguar XF 3.0d (240 Hp) 2015Overall Score83.75/100
2015 Jaguar XF vs 2010 Nissan Cima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Nissan
Cima
Nissan Cima 3.0 i V6 24V Turbo (280 Hp) 2010Overall Score84.75/100
WINNER
Nissan Cima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
83.75–84.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jaguar XFSpecificationNissan Cima
JaguarMakeNissan
XFModelCima
2015Model year2010
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Jaguar XFSpecificationNissan Cima
7,1 s0–100 km/h—
240 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement2988 cc
240 HPPower280 HP
500 NmTorque387 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Jaguar XFSpecificationNissan Cima
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption11 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Jaguar XFSpecificationNissan Cima
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears5
—Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Jaguar XFSpecificationNissan Cima
4966 mmLength4970 mm
1877 mmWidth1820 mm
—Height1450 mm
—Weight1670 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase2830 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Jaguar XF and 2010 Nissan Cima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…