2010 • Nissan
Cima
Nissan Cima 3.0 i V6 24V Turbo (280 Hp) 2010Overall Score84.75/100
2010 Nissan Cima vs 2015 Jaguar XF Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Jaguar
XF
Jaguar XF 3.0d (240 Hp) 2015Overall Score83.75/100
WINNER
Nissan Cima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
84.75–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CimaSpecificationJaguar XF
NissanMakeJaguar
CimaModelXF
2010Model year2015
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Nissan CimaSpecificationJaguar XF
—0–100 km/h7,1 s
230 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2988 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
280 HPPower240 HP
387 NmTorque500 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CimaSpecificationJaguar XF
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
11 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CimaSpecificationJaguar XF
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears8
225/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CimaSpecificationJaguar XF
4970 mmLength4966 mm
1820 mmWidth1877 mm
1450 mmHeight—
1670 KgWeight—
2830 mmWheelbase2909 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Nissan Cima and 2015 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…