DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jaguar XF vs 2012 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XFSpecificationVolvo V40
JaguarMakeVolvo
XFModelV40
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Jaguar XFSpecificationVolvo V40
7,1 s0–100 km/h6,1 s
240 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
240 HPPower254 HP
500 NmTorque360 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XFSpecificationVolvo V40
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption11,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,0 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XFSpecificationVolvo V40
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XFSpecificationVolvo V40
4966 mmLength4369 mm
1877 mmWidth1783 mm
—Height1420 mm
—Weight1574 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jaguar XF and 2012 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…