DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo V40 vs 2012 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V40SpecificationJaguar XF
VolvoMakeJaguar
V40ModelXF
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V40SpecificationJaguar XF
6,1 s0–100 km/h7,1 s
250 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
254 HPPower240 HP
360 NmTorque500 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V40SpecificationJaguar XF
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption—
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,9 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V40SpecificationJaguar XF
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears8
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V40SpecificationJaguar XF
4369 mmLength4966 mm
1783 mmWidth1877 mm
1420 mmHeight—
1574 KgWeight—
2647 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo V40 and 2012 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…