DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jaguar XF vs 2015 GMC Terrain Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeGMC
XFModelTerrain
2012Model year2015
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

7,1 s0–100 km/h—
240 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
240 HPPower264 HP
500 NmTorque301 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank79 lt
—Urban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,8 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6
—Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4966 mmLength4707 mm
1877 mmWidth1849 mm
—Height1684 mm
—Weight1769 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase2858 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jaguar XF and 2015 GMC Terrain approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…