DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jaguar XF vs 2013 Alpina XD3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina XD3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

90.5–91.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina XD3
JaguarMakeAlpina
XFModelXD3
2012Model year2013
SedanBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina XD3
5,9 s0–100 km/h4,9 s
250 km/hTop speed253 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
340 HPPower350 HP
450 NmTorque700 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina XD3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank67 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina XD3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
8Gears8
—Tyre size255/40 ZR20; 285/35 ZR20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina XD3
4961 mmLength4647 mm
1939 mmWidth1901 mm
1468 mmHeight1670 mm
1770 KgWeight1910 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jaguar XF and 2013 Alpina XD3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina XD3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…