DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Alpina D3 vs 2012 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina D3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

91.5–90.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alpina D3SpecificationJaguar XF
AlpinaMakeJaguar
D3ModelXF
2013Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Alpina D3SpecificationJaguar XF
4,6 s0–100 km/h5,9 s
278 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
350 HPPower340 HP
700 NmTorque450 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Alpina D3SpecificationJaguar XF
DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
6 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,0 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Alpina D3SpecificationJaguar XF
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8 Switch TronicGears8
Front tyres: 245/35 ZR19 90Y XL, Rear tyres: 265/35 ZR19 94Y XLTyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Alpina D3SpecificationJaguar XF
—Length4961 mm
—Width1939 mm
—Height1468 mm
—Weight1770 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Alpina D3 and 2012 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina D3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…