DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Jaguar XF vs 2010 Alfa Romeo GT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo GT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeAlfa Romeo
XFModelGT
2011Model year2010
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h6,7 s
237 km/hTop speed243 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement3179 cc
238 HPPower240 HP
0 NmTorque289 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank63 lt
15,8 ltUrban consumption18,6 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4961 mmLength4480 mm
1877 mmWidth1760 mm
1460 mmHeight1390 mm
1690 KgWeight1410 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase2596 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Jaguar XF and 2010 Alfa Romeo GT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo GT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…