DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Jaguar XF vs 2014 Audi TT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XFSpecificationAudi TT
JaguarMakeAudi
XFModelTT
2013Model year2014
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Jaguar XFSpecificationAudi TT
8,5 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
225 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
200 HPPower230 HP
450 NmTorque370 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XFSpecificationAudi TT
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XFSpecificationAudi TT
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6
—Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XFSpecificationAudi TT
4961 mmLength4177 mm
1939 mmWidth1832 mm
1468 mmHeight1353 mm
1735 KgWeight1230 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase2505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Jaguar XF and 2014 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…