DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs 2013 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeJaguar
Range Rover EvoqueModelXF
2015Model year2013
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
200 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
190 HPPower200 HP
420 NmTorque450 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears8
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4355 mmLength4961 mm
1965 mmWidth1939 mm
1635 mmHeight1468 mm
1700 KgWeight1735 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2013 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…