DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Jaguar XF vs 2015 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeLand Rover
XFModelRange Rover Evoque
2013Model year2015
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
225 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
200 HPPower190 HP
450 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption6,7 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
8Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4961 mmLength4355 mm
1939 mmWidth1965 mm
1468 mmHeight1635 mm
1735 KgWeight1700 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Jaguar XF and 2015 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…