2009 • Jaguar
X-type
Jaguar X-type 2.5 i V6 24V (196 Hp) 2009Overall Score73.5/100
2009 Jaguar X-type vs 2010 Volvo XC90 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 2.5i (210 HP) 2010Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Volvo XC90
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jaguar X-typeSpecificationVolvo XC90
JaguarMakeVolvo
X-typeModelXC90
2009Model year2010
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats7
4Doors5
Performance
Jaguar X-typeSpecificationVolvo XC90
8,3 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
225 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2495 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
196 HPPower210 HP
241 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Jaguar X-typeSpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank72 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption16 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,2 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption11,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Jaguar X-typeSpecificationVolvo XC90
4672 mmLength4798 mm
1789 mmWidth1898 mm
1430 mmHeight1743 mm
1570 KgWeight2080 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase2857 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Jaguar X-type and 2010 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableVolvo S80 vs Jaguar X-type2009 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableVolvo V70 vs Jaguar X-type2009 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableFord Kuga vs Jaguar X-type2009 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableVolvo S60 vs Jaguar X-type2009 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableFord Mondeo vs Jaguar X-type2009 and 2009 model yearsComments are loading…