DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Ford Kuga vs 2009 Jaguar X-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeJaguar
KugaModelX-type
2009Model year2009
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
210 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2523 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
200 HPPower196 HP
320 NmTorque241 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank61 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
9,9 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
235/55 R17HTyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4443 mmLength4672 mm
1832 mmWidth1789 mm
1677 mmHeight1430 mm
1573 KgWeight1570 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Ford Kuga and 2009 Jaguar X-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…