DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Jaguar X-type vs 2004 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeVolvo
X-typeModelXC90
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
225 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2495 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
196 HPPower210 HP
241 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank72 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size225/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4672 mmLength4800 mm
1789 mmWidth1890 mm
1430 mmHeight1740 mm
1570 KgWeight1985 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Jaguar X-type and 2004 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…